Why look beyond Make (formerly Integromat)
Make, formerly Integromat, offers a visual, no-code platform for building complex workflows and integrating various applications. Its strength lies in its flexibility and ability to handle intricate logic, often making it a preferred choice for users who need more control than simpler automation tools provide. However, the platform's power can also translate into a steeper learning curve for new users, particularly when designing advanced scenarios or debugging complex data transformations. Some organizations may find its pricing model, which scales based on 'operations' and data transfer, less predictable than alternatives with simpler tiered plans, especially as usage grows. Additionally, while Make offers extensive connectors, specific niche integrations or enterprise-grade features like advanced governance and dedicated support may lead users to explore other iPaaS solutions better tailored to their specific operational scale or compliance requirements. The platform's visual interface, while powerful, can become cumbersome to navigate with extremely large or deeply nested workflows.
Top alternatives ranked
-
1. Zapier — Connects apps and automates workflows with a focus on simplicity
Zapier is a widely recognized iPaaS platform that specializes in connecting web applications and automating workflows. It offers a user-friendly interface designed for ease of use, making it accessible to individuals and small businesses without extensive technical knowledge. Zapier supports a vast ecosystem of integrations, boasting thousands of pre-built connections to popular business applications. While it excels at straightforward, event-driven automations, its visual builder can sometimes be less flexible for highly complex, multi-path workflows compared to Make. However, its expansive app directory and intuitive setup process make it a strong contender for automating common tasks like lead management, notification systems, and data synchronization between SaaS tools. Zapier's pricing model is typically based on tasks and Zaps (automated workflows), offering predictable costs for many use cases.
- Best for: Small to medium businesses, marketing teams, sales teams, quick integrations, users prioritizing ease of use over extreme complexity.
Learn more on the Zapier profile page or visit the official Zapier website.
-
2. Microsoft Power Automate — Enterprise-grade automation within the Microsoft ecosystem
Microsoft Power Automate (formerly Microsoft Flow) is a service that helps users create automated workflows between their favorite apps and services to synchronize files, get notifications, collect data, and more. As part of the Microsoft Power Platform, it offers deep integration with other Microsoft services like Office 365, Dynamics 365, and Azure. This makes it particularly powerful for organizations already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, providing robust capabilities for enterprise-level automation, robotic process automation (RPA) through UI flows, and AI-driven insights. Power Automate supports a wide range of connectors, including many non-Microsoft services, and provides advanced features for governance, security, and scalability. Its visual designer is comprehensive, supporting intricate logic and conditional branching, though it may present a steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with Microsoft's design paradigms. Pricing can vary based on licensing and usage within the broader Microsoft ecosystem.
- Best for: Enterprises, organizations heavily invested in Microsoft products, IT departments, complex business process automation, RPA use cases.
Learn more on the Microsoft Power Automate profile page or visit the official Microsoft Power Automate website.
-
3. Workato — Enterprise automation platform with advanced capabilities
Workato is an enterprise automation platform that combines iPaaS, RPA, and API management capabilities. It is designed for businesses requiring sophisticated integrations and automations across a wide range of applications, data sources, and business processes. Workato emphasizes security, governance, and scalability, making it suitable for large organizations with complex IT environments and stringent compliance requirements. Its platform supports both low-code and no-code development, allowing business users and developers to collaborate on building integrations and automations. Workato offers a comprehensive set of connectors, advanced error handling, and robust monitoring tools. While it provides extensive features for enterprise use cases, its complexity and pricing model are typically geared towards larger organizations rather than individual users or small businesses. Workato's focus on enterprise-grade features often includes advanced data transformation, security policies, and lifecycle management for integrations.
- Best for: Large enterprises, IT departments, business process automation (BPA), API management, organizations needing robust security and governance.
Learn more on the Workato profile page or visit the official Workato website.
-
4. Twilio — Programmable communication APIs for custom workflows
Twilio provides a set of programmable APIs that allow developers to build and automate communication workflows directly into their applications. While not a direct iPaaS like Make, Twilio enables the automation of communication-centric tasks such as sending SMS, making calls, managing video, and integrating email. Developers can use Twilio's APIs to create custom integrations that trigger communications based on events in other systems, effectively building bespoke automation scenarios. For example, a Twilio integration could automatically send an SMS notification when a database record is updated or trigger a phone call based on a schedule. This approach requires coding knowledge to implement, offering maximum flexibility and control for communication-focused automations. It's an alternative for those who need to embed communication capabilities deeply into their products or build very specific communication workflows that generic iPaaS tools might not fully support out-of-the-box without custom code.
- Best for: Developers, custom communication workflows, transactional notifications, building contact centers, two-factor authentication, global SMS marketing.
Learn more on the Twilio profile page or visit the official Twilio documentation.
-
5. Stripe — Payments infrastructure with extensive API for financial automation
Stripe is primarily known as a payment processing platform, but its extensive API and webhook capabilities enable powerful financial automation that can serve as an alternative to general iPaaS for specific use cases. Developers can integrate Stripe to automate billing, subscription management, payment collection, and financial reporting. While it doesn't offer a visual drag-and-drop builder for general workflow automation, its robust API allows for programmatic control over financial operations. For instance, webhooks can trigger custom code or external services when payments succeed or fail, subscriptions change, or refunds are processed. This enables businesses to build highly customized financial workflows, integrate with accounting software, or automate customer communication related to payments. For companies whose core automation needs revolve around financial transactions and related data, Stripe's API provides a powerful foundation for building custom, code-driven workflows.
- Best for: SaaS businesses, e-commerce platforms, marketplaces, subscription services, financial operations automation, developers building custom payment workflows.
Learn more on the Stripe profile page or visit the official Stripe documentation.
-
6. Shopify Admin API — E-commerce automation and store management
The Shopify Admin API provides programmatic access to a Shopify store's data and functionality, allowing merchants and developers to automate various e-commerce operations. While not a general-purpose iPaaS, it serves as a powerful automation tool for businesses operating on the Shopify platform. Through the API, users can manage products, orders, customers, inventory, and more, enabling the creation of custom workflows that extend or enhance Shopify's core capabilities. Examples include automating inventory updates from an external ERP, synchronizing customer data with a CRM, creating custom reporting tools, or managing dynamic pricing. This alternative requires development skills to implement, as it involves writing code to interact with the API. For businesses deeply embedded in the Shopify ecosystem, the Admin API offers a highly tailored and efficient way to automate store operations and integrate with third-party systems without relying on a generic workflow builder.
- Best for: Shopify store owners, e-commerce businesses, developers building Shopify apps, automating store operations, custom reporting, inventory management.
Learn more on the Shopify Admin API profile page or visit the official Shopify Admin API documentation.
-
7. Google Maps Platform — Location-based service automation
Google Maps Platform offers a suite of APIs and SDKs for building location-based experiences, which can be integrated into custom automation workflows. While not a direct alternative for general iPaaS, it enables specific types of automation related to geospatial data. For instance, businesses can automate tasks like calculating optimal delivery routes, geocoding addresses for customer data, tracking assets in real-time, or displaying location-based insights on a map. These capabilities are crucial for logistics, ride-sharing, real estate, and field service management. Integrating Google Maps Platform APIs into a system typically requires coding, allowing for precise control over how location data is used and automated. This is an alternative for organizations whose primary automation needs involve geographic information and location intelligence, where a general iPaaS might only offer basic integrations or require significant custom development to achieve specific mapping functionalities.
- Best for: Logistics, transportation, real estate, field service management, location-based marketing, asset tracking, geospatial data analysis.
Learn more on the Google Maps Platform profile page or visit the official Google Maps Platform documentation.
Side-by-side
| Feature/Platform | Make (formerly Integromat) | Zapier | Microsoft Power Automate | Workato | Twilio | Stripe | Shopify Admin API | Google Maps Platform |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Use Case | General workflow automation, app integration | App connection, simple task automation | Enterprise process automation, RPA, Microsoft ecosystem integration | Enterprise automation, iPaaS, RPA, API management | Programmable communication (SMS, Voice, Video) | Payment processing, financial automation | E-commerce store automation, management | Location-based services, geospatial data automation |
| Visual Builder | Yes (advanced) | Yes (simple) | Yes (comprehensive) | Yes (low-code/no-code) | No (API-driven) | No (API-driven) | No (API-driven) | No (API/SDK driven) |
| Learning Curve | Moderate to High | Low | Moderate | Moderate to High | High (coding required) | High (coding required) | High (coding required) | High (coding required) |
| Number of Connectors | 1,500+ | 6,000+ | 1,000+ | 1,000+ | N/A (focus on communication) | N/A (focus on payments) | N/A (Shopify ecosystem) | N/A (geospatial services) |
| Enterprise Focus | Moderate | Low to Moderate | High | High | Moderate (developer-centric) | High (developer-centric) | High (developer-centric) | High (developer-centric) |
| Pricing Model | Operations, data transfer | Tasks, Zaps | User/flow-based, licensing | Usage, connectors, features | Usage-based (per message/call) | Transaction fees, custom | Shopify plan + API usage | Usage-based (API calls, data) |
| Primary Audience | Developers, power users, SMBs | SMBs, non-technical users, marketing | Enterprises, IT pros, business analysts | Enterprises, IT pros, developers | Developers | Developers, financial teams | Developers, e-commerce managers | Developers, geospatial analysts |
How to pick
Selecting an alternative to Make (formerly Integromat) depends on your specific automation needs, technical capabilities, and organizational scale. Consider the following factors:
- Complexity of Workflows: If your primary need is simple, event-driven automation between common SaaS applications, Zapier offers an intuitive, low-friction solution. For highly complex, multi-step workflows with intricate logic, conditional branching, and custom data transformations, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, or Workato provide more robust visual builders and advanced capabilities.
- Integration Ecosystem: Evaluate the breadth and depth of pre-built connectors. If you're heavily invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, Power Automate offers unparalleled integration. If you need to connect to thousands of diverse apps with minimal effort, Zapier is strong. For enterprise-grade systems and niche applications, Workato may offer more specialized connectors and robust API management features.
- Technical Expertise: For non-technical users or small teams, Zapier's simplicity is a major advantage. Make strikes a balance, offering visual complexity that power users can master. Microsoft Power Automate is accessible but can scale to developer-level complexity. For highly custom, code-driven automations, particularly those involving communication (Twilio), payments (Stripe), e-commerce (Shopify Admin API), or location data (Google Maps Platform), direct API integration requires developer resources but offers maximum flexibility.
- Scalability and Governance: Enterprises with high transaction volumes, strict security requirements, and complex compliance mandates will benefit from platforms like Workato and Microsoft Power Automate, which offer advanced features for governance, monitoring, and scalability. Make also provides enterprise features but may require more manual configuration for governance.
- Pricing Model: Understand how each platform charges. Make and Zapier often base pricing on operations/tasks, which can be unpredictable for fluctuating usage. Enterprise solutions like Workato and Power Automate may have more complex, feature-based or user-based licensing. API-first solutions like Twilio, Stripe, Shopify, and Google Maps typically use usage-based pricing, charging per API call, message, or transaction.
- Specific Use Case: If your automation is centered around a specific domain, consider specialized alternatives. For example, if communication is key, Twilio is purpose-built. For financial automation, Stripe's API is highly effective. For e-commerce operations on Shopify, the Shopify Admin API provides direct control. For location intelligence, Google Maps Platform is the go-to.