Coinremitter Pricing: Fees and Costs Explained (2026)

Pricing overview

Coinremitter utilizes a transaction-based pricing model for its cryptocurrency payment gateway and wallet API services. The core fee structure includes a percentage charge on incoming transactions and additional fixed or variable fees for cryptocurrency withdrawals. There are no monthly subscription fees or setup costs associated with using the platform, allowing users to pay only for the services consumed. This approach is common among cryptocurrency payment processors, distinguishing them from traditional fiat payment gateways that might combine transaction fees with monthly charges or tiered plans Stripe Payments overview.

The transaction fee for payments received through Coinremitter starts at 0.19%. This percentage applies to the value of the cryptocurrency received. For example, if a customer pays 0.01 BTC, the fee would be 0.19% of that 0.01 BTC. Withdrawal fees are separate and depend on the specific cryptocurrency being withdrawn, often reflecting network transaction costs. These fees are detailed on the official Coinremitter pricing page and within their documentation Coinremitter's official pricing details. For developers integrating the API, access to wallet functionalities and payment processing is included in this transaction-based model, with no direct API call charges.

Plans and tiers

Coinremitter operates without distinct pricing plans or tiers. Instead, it offers a uniform fee structure applicable to all users, regardless of transaction volume or specific service usage. This simplified model provides consistent pricing for all businesses, from small e-commerce sites to larger enterprises. The absence of tiered plans means that all users receive the same basic transaction fee rate of 0.19% for incoming payments.

While there are no explicit 'plans,' the pricing does differentiate between transaction types:

• Incoming Payments: A 0.19% fee on the amount received. This applies to payments processed through the Coinremitter gateway.
• Withdrawals: Fees vary by the specific cryptocurrency and blockchain network conditions. These are typically fixed amounts per withdrawal, intended to cover the network transaction fees and a small service charge. For instance, withdrawing Bitcoin may incur a different fee than withdrawing Ethereum or Litecoin. Users are typically shown the exact withdrawal fee before confirming the transaction Coinremitter API documentation.

This model simplifies cost prediction, as businesses do not need to monitor their monthly volume to determine their applicable tier or potential fee reductions. The focus remains solely on the individual transaction costs for both receiving and withdrawing funds.

Here is a summary table of Coinremitter's primary fee types:

Free tier and limits

Coinremitter does not offer a free tier for its services. All transactions processed through the platform, including incoming cryptocurrency payments and withdrawals, incur associated fees. This means that users must account for these costs from their first transaction onward. The absence of a free tier is a direct consequence of their transaction-based pricing model, where every service interaction is designed to cover operational expenses.

While there is no free tier, Coinremitter also does not impose limits on transaction volume or the number of API calls that might typically be associated with free plans in other services. Users can process any volume of payments without needing to upgrade to a paid tier, as the pricing scale is inherently built into the per-transaction fee. This differs from platforms like Twilio Twilio pricing guide, which offer a limited free tier before requiring paid usage for increased scale.

Key points regarding the absence of a free tier:

• No Trial Period: There is no specified free trial period for the payment gateway or wallet API functionalities. Users wishing to test the service would incur minimal transaction fees on live operations.
• Immediate Cost Incurrence: Fees are applied to all successful incoming payments (0.19%) and withdrawals from the outset.
• No Volume Caps: The lack of a free tier also means there are no volume-based limits that would force an upgrade. The 0.19% fee applies universally.

Businesses considering Coinremitter should factor these immediate transaction costs into their financial planning, even for initial testing or low-volume operations.

Real-world cost examples

To illustrate Coinremitter's pricing, consider a few practical scenarios for an e-commerce business accepting cryptocurrency payments.

Example 1: Processing a single Bitcoin payment

• Scenario: A customer purchases an item for 0.005 BTC.
• Incoming Payment Fee: 0.19% of 0.005 BTC = 0.0000095 BTC.
• Net Amount Received: 0.005 BTC - 0.0000095 BTC = 0.0049905 BTC.
• Withdrawal Fee: If the business decides to withdraw this 0.0049905 BTC to an external wallet, an additional fixed Bitcoin withdrawal fee would apply (e.g., 0.0002 BTC, though this figure is illustrative and subject to Coinremitter's current rates and network conditions).
• Total Cost for transaction and withdrawal: 0.0000095 BTC (payment fee) + 0.0002 BTC (withdrawal fee) = 0.0002095 BTC.

Example 2: Multiple payments and a consolidated withdrawal

• Scenario: A business receives ten payments over a week, each for 0.001 ETH, totaling 0.01 ETH. They then withdraw the entire 0.01 ETH.
• Incoming Payment Fees: 10 transactions * (0.19% of 0.001 ETH) = 10 * 0.0000019 ETH = 0.000019 ETH.
• Net Amount Received: 0.01 ETH - 0.000019 ETH = 0.009981 ETH.
• Withdrawal Fee: A single Ethereum withdrawal fee would apply (e.g., 0.003 ETH, illustrative).
• Total Cost: 0.000019 ETH (payment fees) + 0.003 ETH (withdrawal fee) = 0.003019 ETH.

These examples highlight that transaction costs are primarily driven by the volume and number of payments received, along with the frequency and type of cryptocurrency withdrawals. Consolidating withdrawals can mitigate the impact of fixed withdrawal fees.

How the pricing compares

Coinremitter's pricing model, characterized by a 0.19% transaction fee and variable withdrawal fees, can be compared to other cryptocurrency payment gateways, each with unique structures.

• Coinbase Commerce: Coinbase Commerce typically charges a 1% transaction fee for payments received. While higher than Coinremitter's 0.19%, Coinbase Commerce often simplifies the conversion and payout to fiat currency, potentially reducing the need for separate withdrawal actions if the merchant prefers fiat. Coinbase Commerce also does not charge for direct crypto-to-crypto transactions between Coinbase users. For more information, see the Coinbase Commerce platform overview.
• Blockonomics: Blockonomics charges a 1% fee for incoming payments, similar to Coinbase Commerce. It focuses heavily on direct-to-wallet payments, which means funds often go straight to the merchant's external wallet, potentially bypassing internal withdrawal fees but incurring network transaction fees immediately. Further details on their fee structure are available on the Blockonomics website.
• BTCPay Server: BTCPay Server is an open-source, self-hosted payment processor. It generally has no transaction fees beyond the standard blockchain network fees, as merchants host and control their own instance. This eliminates third-party transaction processing fees, making it a zero-fee option from a service provider perspective, though it requires technical overhead for setup and maintenance. Merchants bear the full cost of network fees for transactions and withdrawals. Learn about hosting your own instance at the BTCPay Server official site.

In summary, Coinremitter's 0.19% incoming transaction fee is among the lowest in the market for managed cryptocurrency payment gateway services. This positions it as a cost-effective option for businesses primarily focused on minimizing processing percentages for received payments. However, the separate withdrawal fees mean that the total cost depends on how frequently funds are moved off the platform. Alternatives like BTCPay Server offer a completely free service model in terms of provider fees, but shift the operational burden and direct network fee burden entirely to the merchant. Other providers like Coinbase Commerce and Blockonomics often have higher percentage fees but might offer different value propositions, such as integrated fiat conversion or direct wallet deposits.