Pricing overview
Bitmex employs a maker-taker fee model for its trading services, which encompasses perpetual swaps, futures contracts, and spot trading. This model distinguishes between orders that add liquidity to the order book (maker orders) and those that remove liquidity (taker orders). Maker orders are often incentivized with rebates or lower fees, while taker orders typically incur a standard fee. The specific fee rates can vary based on the type of derivative being traded and a user's cumulative 30-day trading volume, which determines their fee tier.
In addition to standard trading fees, Bitmex also features a funding mechanism for its perpetual swap contracts. Funding fees are exchanged directly between long and short position holders at regular intervals, typically every eight hours. These fees are not paid to Bitmex but serve to keep the perpetual swap price anchored to the underlying spot price. The direction and magnitude of funding rates depend on market conditions and the difference between the perpetual contract price and the spot price. Users should consult the official Bitmex fees page for the most current and detailed information on all applicable charges.
Withdrawal fees on Bitmex are generally limited to the network transaction costs associated with transferring cryptocurrency. Bitmex does not typically charge an additional fee beyond what is required by the blockchain network itself. However, minimum withdrawal amounts may apply for certain assets. Deposits of cryptocurrency are generally free of charge.
Plans and tiers
Bitmex's fee structure is primarily tiered based on a user's 30-day trading volume, influencing the maker and taker fees applied to their trades. While there aren't distinct "plans" in the traditional subscription sense, the volume-based tiers effectively create different pricing levels for active traders. The higher the trading volume, the more favorable the fees become, particularly for maker orders.
The fee schedule is detailed on the Bitmex website and typically differentiates between various product types, such as perpetual contracts, traditional futures, and spot trading. Each product may have slightly different base fees, before volume-based discounts are applied. For example, perpetual contracts often have a standard maker fee that can be a rebate (a negative percentage), meaning traders receive a small payment for providing liquidity, while taker fees are positive percentages.
The following table illustrates a general overview of the fee structure. Specific percentages are subject to change and should be verified on the official Bitmex fee schedule.
| Fee Type | Perpetual/Futures (Base) | Spot Trading (Base) | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker Fee | -0.010% (rebate) | 0.00% | Reduced or negative (rebate) for higher volume tiers. Adds liquidity to the order book. |
| Taker Fee | 0.075% | 0.075% | Consistent across most product types; may be reduced for highest volume tiers. Removes liquidity from the order book. |
| Funding Fee | Variable (applies to perpetuals) | N/A | Exchanged between long/short holders every 8 hours; not a fee to Bitmex. |
| Withdrawal Fees | Network fees only | Network fees only | Determined by blockchain network congestion; no additional Bitmex charge. |
Beyond these primary trading fees, Bitmex may also include small administrative fees for specific actions, though these are less common for regular trading. For instance, some institutional services might incur additional charges. Developers integrating with the Bitmex API should be aware that all trading activities initiated programmatically are subject to the same fee structure as manual trades. The Bitmex API documentation provides details on order types and their implications for maker/taker status.
Free tier and limits
Bitmex does not offer a free tier for trading activities. All trades executed on the platform, whether spot, perpetual, or futures contracts, are subject to the applicable maker or taker fees. This means that even small trades will incur a charge based on the prevailing fee schedule and the user's trading volume tier. While there is no fee for creating an account or depositing funds, active trading necessitates direct engagement with the fee structure.
The absence of a free trading tier is common among derivatives exchanges that cater to professional traders and institutional clients, where the focus is on competitive fee structures for high-volume trading rather than free access for casual users. The Bitmex model is designed to reward liquidity providers (makers) with rebates, encouraging active market participation. For a deeper understanding of maker-taker models in exchanges, resources like the Mozilla Developer Network's glossary entry on the maker-taker model can provide additional context.
Regarding limits, Bitmex imposes minimum order sizes for various contracts, which can effectively act as a barrier for very small-scale trading. Withdrawal limits and daily withdrawal caps may also apply, though these are often high enough to accommodate most users. API rate limits are also in place to ensure fair usage and system stability, preventing abuse and ensuring consistent performance for all users. These rate limits are detailed within the Bitmex REST API Introduction documentation.
Real-world cost examples
To illustrate Bitmex's pricing in action, consider the following hypothetical scenarios for a user whose 30-day trading volume places them in a standard tier with a 0.075% taker fee and a -0.010% maker rebate for perpetual swaps, and a 0.075% taker fee and 0.00% maker fee for spot trading:
Scenario 1: Trading Bitcoin Perpetual Swaps (Taker Order)
- Action: User buys 1 BTC worth of XBTUSD perpetual swaps as a taker order.
- Notional Value: Assume 1 BTC at $60,000.
- Taker Fee: 0.075%
- Cost: $60,000 * 0.00075 = $45.00
- Outcome: The user pays $45.00 in fees to execute this trade.
Scenario 2: Trading Bitcoin Perpetual Swaps (Maker Order)
- Action: User places a limit order to sell 1 BTC worth of XBTUSD perpetual swaps, which is filled as a maker order.
- Notional Value: Assume 1 BTC at $60,000.
- Maker Rebate: -0.010%
- Rebate Received: $60,000 * 0.00010 = $6.00
- Outcome: The user receives a $6.00 rebate for providing liquidity to the market.
Scenario 3: Spot Trading Ethereum (Taker Order)
- Action: User buys 10 ETH on the spot market as a taker order.
- Notional Value: Assume 1 ETH at $3,000, total $30,000.
- Taker Fee: 0.075%
- Cost: $30,000 * 0.00075 = $22.50
- Outcome: The user pays $22.50 in fees for the spot purchase.
Scenario 4: Long Perpetual Swap Position with Funding Fee
- Action: User holds a long position of 0.5 BTC (notional value $30,000) in XBTUSD perpetual swaps for 24 hours, during which funding occurs three times.
- Notional Value: $30,000
- Assumed Funding Rate: +0.01% (longs pay shorts) per 8-hour period.
- Funding Paid per period: $30,000 * 0.0001 = $3.00
- Total Funding Paid (24 hours): $3.00 * 3 = $9.00
- Outcome: In addition to trading fees, the user pays $9.00 in funding to short position holders over 24 hours. If the funding rate were negative, the user would receive funding.
These examples highlight that active traders can significantly reduce costs by strategically placing maker orders. Funding fees on perpetual contracts are an additional variable cost that traders must monitor, as they can represent a substantial expense or income stream depending on market sentiment and position direction.
How the pricing compares
Bitmex's pricing structure, characterized by its maker-taker model and volume-tiered fees, is broadly competitive within the cryptocurrency derivatives exchange landscape. When compared to alternatives like Binance, Bybit, and OKX, Bitmex often positions itself with a focus on institutional and experienced traders, offering deep liquidity and a robust trading engine. However, specific fee percentages can vary and are subject to frequent adjustments by exchanges based on market competition and internal strategies.
- Maker Fees: Bitmex's maker rebates (e.g., -0.010%) for perpetuals are competitive and often better than or comparable to those offered by some alternatives, incentivizing liquidity provision. Many exchanges offer zero maker fees or small rebates for their highest volume tiers, but Bitmex's base rebate is a strong point.
- Taker Fees: The standard taker fee of 0.075% on Bitmex is generally in line with industry averages for perpetual and futures contracts. Some competing platforms may offer slightly lower taker fees for very high-volume VIP tiers, but for most active traders, Bitmex's rate is competitive. For example, some exchanges might start with a 0.075% taker fee and reduce it for higher volumes, similar to Bitmex.
- Spot Trading Fees: For spot trading, Bitmex's 0.00% maker fee and 0.075% taker fee are also competitive. Some exchanges might offer slightly lower spot trading fees, especially for stablecoin pairs or promotional periods, but Bitmex's offering is solid for active spot traders.
- Funding Rates: While not a direct fee to the exchange, funding rates on perpetual swaps are a crucial cost component. Bitmex's funding mechanism is standard across the industry, with rates fluctuating based on market conditions. Traders should compare historical funding rate trends across platforms if this is a significant concern for their strategy.
- Withdrawal Fees: Bitmex's policy of only charging network fees for withdrawals is standard and favorable. Many exchanges follow this practice, though some might add a small administrative fee.
Ultimately, the "best" pricing depends on a trader's specific strategy, trading volume, and preferred asset classes. A high-frequency trader who primarily places limit orders (makers) might find Bitmex's rebate structure very appealing. Conversely, a casual trader executing market orders (takers) might find the taker fees comparable across multiple major platforms. It is always advisable to consult the official fee schedules of Bitmex and its competitors, such as Cloudflare's developer documentation for API-related costs or Stripe's pricing documentation for payment processing, to conduct a direct and up-to-date comparison relevant to specific use cases.